Mardi Gras

Mardi Gras will soon be with us. We were thinking of throwing a party. For some reason a champagne and hummus theme came to mind. Do come

Unintended consequences

Tim's borderline-obsessive hatred of CILIP seems to have be having the opposite effect to that intended. See here, where it seems that he has convinced someone who had not yet joined that he should.

We hold no brief for CILIP, indeed their Vice-President has gone to some, occasionally intemperate, lengths to repudiate us: http://philbradley.typepad.com/phil_bradleys_weblog/2011/02/coates-watch.html It was the only Valentine we had.

Nevertheless, we do think that the organisation might react in stronger terms to Tim's attempts to dictate, from outside the profession, how it should organise itself. If we were to decide that the Booksellers' Association had lost its way, and pontificate on how it should improve itself, we imagine we would be sent away with several fleas in our ears. Yet is is apparently entirely reasonable for Tim, and the quisling he has gathered to his bosom, to tell librarians what to do. Furthermore, he continues to fall into the vulgar error that the membership of CILIP consists only of professionally qualified public librarians. Over the years, many people have pointed out to him how much of a misconception this is, but his ears are stopped.

Is librarianship a profession? We think so; it is certainly more of a profession than being a travelling seller of patent medicines to Tory councillors.

By their friends shall ye know them part 2

To be expected: http://conservativehome.blogs.com/localgovernment/2011/02/how-to-cut-library-spending-wiithout-cutting-libraries.html

According to Wikipedia, Conservative Home 'aims to represent UK grassroots Conservative opinion'. CoatesWatch reads that as a polite way to describe those who, in earlier generations, supported the League of Empire Loyalists or the Monday Club, those who believe that Winston and Maggie are not gone but sleep under a mountain and will wake in a hundred years time to lead them to purge the nation of trade unionists, people with dark skins and anyone who doesn't read the Express, Mail or Telegraph.

That's not what we thought it was called

 

Stop press: a CILIP announcement says that it's cancelled, because all the speakers have withdrawn. There's no statement on the organisers' blog, SINTOblog, but a short announcement on SINTO's events page.

And another update, 22nd February: SINTO have now published a statement: http://sintoblog.blogspot.com/2011/02/sinto-library-campaigns-event.html. They sound miffed.

 

I am (not) Spartacus

There seems to have been no small furore over our identity, a reverse Spartacus, if you like, with each member of the crowd shouting out. 'I am not Spartacus'. If it helps, we're happy to say that all the theories we've seen are wrong.

Some points though, particularly on the discussion on Phil Bradley's blog (note Phil, that we bear you no ill will and will honour the usual conventions of citing a blog when we talk about it...you're free not to, of course, though we think it diminishes you):

• We're not stalkers. We have no interest in Tim's private life, indeed the idea rather revolts us. Everything we write about is in the public domain
• We're part of an honourable internet tradition. If there was an inspiration for this blog, it was perhaps AaronovitchWatch, which chronicles the rightwards journey of Dave Aaronovitch, son of the rather good Communist economist who, having taken Murdoch's shilling, moved rapidly to the right and took to writing a contrarian column in the Times. You'll find many other sites in the same mould, usually around someone with a particularly high, and perhaps unjustified, view of themselves
• And, as for Gareth Osler's suggestion that we're the BNP, after we'd picked ourselves up from the floor, we thought we should mention that Tim is, as far as we know, neither Jewish, nor black, not Muslim....and we can write English unlike knuckle-dragging racists.
• Do we indulge in ad hominem arguments? Perhaps, but this is politics, and it is a dirty business. TC is not known for fighting according to Queensbury rules
• We don't particularly care if people follow or unfollow us. We're going to keep doing this so long as libraries need saving, and Tim keeps trying to disrupt the struggle to do so
• Tim has to be understood politically. He represents a right-wing 'libertarian' point of view. It hates people who work, and believes in managerialism, in the power of the 'consumer' and the market. It is profoundly reactionary

We made an offer to Phil today. We repeat it here: if he can obtain a binding commitment from Tim to stop attacking library workers, we'll pack up and go home. If he doesn't someone needs to speak up for people who will lose their jobs and services when a council pays Tim a fat fee. We think back to the miners' struggle of the 1980s: which side are you on, we used to sing.

A Valentine

Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
Does Tim love Ed Vaizey,
And Cameron too?

By their friends shall ye know them

We were moved, following some of yesterday's discussions, to investigate the murky world of our man's Twitter accounts. There are two, for some reason:  @GoodLibraryBlog, which first tweeted on 15th October (remember that, the day the great Library Alliance, that has played such a prominent part in recent campaigns was launched) and has managed a total of three tweets in four months,  and @GoodLibraries, first tweeted on 8th February, racing ahead with four lifetime tweets.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is who @GoodLibraryBlog has chosen to follow. From the screenshot below, you will see that Ed Vaizey seems not to have realised he's in government yet (we knew Tories can be slow on the uptake but really) and that he also follows Richard D North, the neo-con who made such an ass of himself on You and Yours. When one follows so few people, it has to be read as a declaration of one's sympathies.

 

Nurse! The screens!

Tim clearly hasn't been taking his medication. The latest offering at the Good Library Blog is a spittle-flecked rant against CILIP and against librarians as a species, with a few side-swipes at the "literacy industry' who, according to Tim, swill champagne and hummus at parties in Clerkenwell and Wandsworth.

One doubts, somehow, that someone who was once, as he never tires of reminding us, the MD of Waterstones, is a stranger to champagne; senior management in the bookselling industry are not known for spartan fare when organising the endless dinners, conferences, launches and receptions without which business would grind to a halt. What is the matter, Tim? DId your invitation get lost in the post? CoatesWatch would refuse to attend any party where they serve champagne to wash down hummus; so terribly non-U, and actually rather disgusting.

Tim usually has the common-sense to keep his more extreme views to himself, so it's interesting to speculate as to why he chooses this particular moment to let the mask slip. Sidelined, both in the media and by the tremendous support for the actions of 5th February, in which he played no part whatsoever, perhaps he feels it is time to make his mark. A more Machiavellian interpretation, given that his intention seems to be to split the developing movement to #savelibraries, could be that he's in the pay of Vaizey and Cameron—but only conspiracy theorists would think that.

 

 

 

Caption competition

Entries to coateswatch@gmail.com. We have to say, whoever tidied those shelves didn't know what they were at. Volunteers?

 

Coates on film

Just in time for the BAFTAs and Oscars, Tim takes his first steps towards stardom. On YouTube or, as one of his acolytes put it, U-Tube, he may be seen holding forth to the good people of Somerset.

We turned to our film studies expert, Professor Jean-Luc Bergman-Allen, of the University of Loamshire. 'What is interesting', he told us, 'is how the director here subverts traditional cinematic values of form and narrative structure and instead gives us work that, transcending its technical shortcomings, makes us ask the question, what is life and, if there are another 33 minutes of this stuff to sit through, is it worth living? In such a way, he gives us a Coates who is both Coates, and not-Coates, self and other, and it is in the dialectical relationship of these that we find such slight resolution that the work offers at the end. The crass fetishisation of the book leads us to speculate about the place of that object in the subject's infantile sexual awakening and, pace Lacan and Žižek, whether a radical hermeneutics of the library might not be an achievable project. More Pernod? Don't mind if I do.'

5th February

What a day! Those who accuse CoatesWatch of being negative should have seen our happy smiling faces as we followed the press coverage, the read-ins and shhh-ins, the Twitter stream at #savelibraries and the Facebook activity, and the thousands of people who, even if there was no organised event, went to their local library to borrow books, use the services and show their support. We took part, locally and in modest ways.

One question: where in all this was the world's leading library campaigner? There is no evidence we can see that he took part in anything at all. The only change we can see is that the Good Library Blog now displays a besotted tribute from Boyd Tonkin, describing our hero as a 'modernising four-star general' and a 'key strategist'. We would be wary of these epithets. For this government, as for the last, to 'modernise' something is to close it down.

The description of him as a general reminds us of the story of the private fleeing the battle front in World War I? Eventually, panting, he stops for a rest. 'What's the matter with you, man?' booms a voice. 'Don't you salute when you see a general?' 'Blimey' replies the soldier, 'I didn't know I'd run that far'.